On Acceptance
“God, grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change,
the courage to change the things I can,
and the wisdom to know the difference.
—Reinhold Niebuhr, 1892-1971
Tommy struggled with the idea of acceptance. After all, what happened to him was, by defintion, unacceptable in every real sense. He had lost his daughter at the hands of a callous legal system that was ill-equipped to handle the copmplexity of divorce and the effect it had on children born of a marriage. He had learned through bitter experience that the Japanese sought to simplfy the complex, a kind of reductio ad absurdum that posited the notion that children are essentilly chattel in the eyes of the law, and that upon divorce, they belong exclsuively to one parent or another, invariably the Japanese parent in an international marriage and/or to the mother otherwise with whom they simplistically belived the child is always better off despite whatever failings that mother might exhibit. On top of this, Japanese “mental health specialists” hold with a belief that is contrary to all established psychological thought throughout the world, that belief being that upon divorce a child is better off severing all ties with one parent or another due to a ludicrous notion that it is better for the child not to have “divided loyalties.” Such was the impeneetrable wall he found himself flung against. And he knew that Livy suffered from these heartless ideas as much as he did.
But the notion of acceptance ran deeper than simply reconciling himself with the system that made him a non-parent in the eyes of the law. The problem with surrendering to the tide that sought to sweep him away was the fear that by accepting what had happened to him involved a surrender of hope — hope that one day he and Livy would one day be reunited. He feared losing that only connection he still had with his daughter — the one he himself maintained by “keeping the faith.” Despite the pitaflls of that hope, which the character Red in the film Shawshank Redemption described as a “dangerous thing” in that it “could drive a man insane,” it nevertheless served to establish in him a belief that one day the long sought after reunion would occur, despite the dual distances of time and place. Hope was the only link he still had with Livy, and Tommy often felt that losing that hope, by “moving on” with his life, would be a kind of death of his child that he was unwilling to accept. Accepting that she was gone forever from his life was simply too much to bear.
And so he persisted in holding to the ancient Latin adage of “dum spiro spero” — “while I breathe I hope.” Maybe if he really did let her go completely — if he accepted this untenable reality — he might in fact “move on” from the pain occasioned by his loss. Still, besides the horror of accepting such an idea, Tommy also felt that such acceptance amounted to a betrayal to his daughter, and indeed, to himself and to the love he once felt and still felt for Livy. He would not leave her behind as he had been left behind. He recalled the words of Elizabeth II upn the detah of her beloved Prince, that “grief is the price we pay for love.” It is the scars that we bear that remind us that the past was real. It was the bittersweet memories he had of his time together with Livy that were the last remnants of his erstwhile fatherhood, and he’d be Goddamned if he would try to suppress them even in the teary hours of the night as he lay in bed hoping for sleep to overtake him.






























































